Is it the sanctimony, not the hypocrisy?

Commenter "Doug" says that Sanford's sin was sanctimony, not hypocrisy.

I guess he means that Sanford lead the charge to get Clinton impeached. Payback is a bitch.

Of course, we ALL know that the real reason Clinton was impeached was that he lied under oath in a sexual harassment deposition by Paula Jones. Clinton has a history of abusing women whom he has power over. He's a grade A scumbag. Lewinsky was just a little more... receptive... than the other women he abused, but what he did with her was still abusive.

Back to Sanford. The real issue, in my mind, is that certain people are Schadenfreude-ing him because of his previous positions on family values.

Should anyone doubt that Sanford was right that cheating, no fault divorce, and out of wedlock childbirths are destroying America, here's an introduction.

BTW, my parents just got divorced after 35 years of marriage. So the issue is a little raw with me. I'm just thankful that they lasted as long as they did. Even so, dealing with them now as singles is... upsetting. I can imagine how the Sanford kids feel.